Peer Review Process
All manuscripts submitted to JOEES: Journal of Elementary Education Studies will undergo a rigorous peer review process to ensure the quality and integrity of the published research. The journal uses a double-blind peer review system, where both the reviewers and the authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.
Steps in the Review Process:
-
Initial Editorial Screening
-
Each manuscript is first reviewed by the editorial team to ensure it meets the journal's focus, scope, and formatting guidelines.
-
Manuscripts that do not meet the basic requirements or contain major ethical issues (e.g., plagiarism) will be desk-rejected.
-
-
Assignment to Reviewers
-
Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are assigned to two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field.
-
The review process is double-blind, meaning the reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and vice versa.
-
-
Review Process
-
Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on:
-
Relevance and originality of the topic
-
Clarity of research questions and objectives
-
Soundness of methodology and data analysis
-
Depth of discussion and interpretation
-
Contribution to the field of elementary education
-
Use of relevant and up-to-date references
-
-
Reviewers submit their recommendations to the editor, which can be:
-
Accept without revision
-
Minor revisions required
-
Major revisions required
-
Reject
-
-
-
Editorial Decision
-
Based on the reviewers’ comments and recommendations, the editor makes a final decision.
-
If revisions are required, authors are given time to revise and resubmit their manuscript along with a response to reviewers document.
-
-
Second Round of Review (if needed)
-
Revised manuscripts may be sent back to the original reviewers for re-evaluation, especially in cases of major revisions.
-
-
Final Decision
-
The editor makes the final decision (accept/reject) based on the reviewers’ feedback and the quality of the revisions.
-
-
Copyediting and Publication
-
Accepted manuscripts will go through a final editing stage, including language editing, formatting, and proofreading before being published online.
-
Review Timeline
The peer review process typically takes 6 to 8 weeks, depending on the responsiveness of the reviewers and the quality of the manuscript.
Reviewer Ethics
-
Reviewers are expected to provide constructive, fair, and timely feedback.
-
They must declare any conflict of interest and decline the review if one exists.
-
Reviewers must treat the manuscript as confidential and may not use any part of its content prior to publication.